|
Winter 2001
My
quest for Dr. Vasey began as a simple attempt to locate
information about plants to guide the composition of restoration
plans. As I have so often found in conducting research for
purely ecological reasons over the past decade, beneath
the empirical data lay a compelling human drama.
Fifteen
years ago I joined McHenry County Conservation Districts
newly formed Resource Management Division and moved my family
near the districts headquarters in Ringwood, Illinois.
Eager to learn everything of relevance to McHenry Countys
natural history, I devoured information wherever I could
obtain it, including that cornerstone for understanding
the complexities of the plant communities of northeastern
Illinois, Swink and Wilhelms Plants
of the Chicago Region.
Anyone
familiar with this tome knows it is not light reading. Persistently
I plowed through the confusing matrix of Latin names a few
pages each day. As my botanical comfort level grew, I began
to notice periodic references to the town of Ringwood. Without
exception, the botanical reference to Ringwood also identified
George Vasey as the collector of the relevant specimen.
"Agoseris
cuspidata, PRAIRIE DANDELION. One of our very rarest
plants. Known in our area only from McHenry County, where
it was collected by Vasey in a prairie at Ringwood on
May 20, 1858."
Not
only did Ringwoods location, a mile south of the District
headquarters intrigue me, but also the early dates of many
of the specimens. I reasoned that as a botanist Vasey might
have left records related to the countys natural communities
before many of the human changes associated with the last
170 years had occurred. As time allowed, I began to unravel
the mystery of this pioneer plant collector from Ringwood.
Over
the years that search has spanned two continents, three
countries, and dozens of museums, arboretums, and libraries
as each new piece of information produced new leads. I have
reviewed nearly 300 letters written by Dr. Vasey, most dated
between 1849 and 1866, the time period corresponding to
his active collecting in northeastern Illinois. Many Vasey
letters provide tantalizing clues about the composition
and structure of the Chicago regions natural communities.
Perhaps more importantly, his insights and observations
have allowed me to see the landscape from a fresh perspective,
through the eyes of a man living in a time when much of
the human impact on our natural heritage lay in the distant
future.
Background
George
Vasey was born in Scarborough, England, in 1822. His family
immigrated to North America the next year, settling in Oriskany,
New York, and moved to Illinois around 1840.
The
fourth of 10 children, Vasey left school at 12 to take a
job as a store clerk. Unable to afford books on botany,
he borrowed several, copying them entirely by hand. During
Vaseys tenure as a clerk, he met and befriended Dr.
P. D. Knieskern, a physician and one of the foremost botanists
of the day. Encouraged by Knieskern, Vasey eventually entered
into a botanical correspondence with Asa Gray at Harvard
and other prominent botanists. Vaseys relationship
with Gray, who was then preparing one of the first comprehensive
botany manuals, flourished for decades to come.
At
21, George completed advanced studies at Oneida Institute
and decided to study medicine, graduating from the Berkshire
Medical Institute in Pittsfield, Massachusetts, in 1846.
Vasey married Martha Scott of Oriskany and a year later
relocated to Ringwood, arriving via the Erie Canal. Here,
he would spend the next 18 years of his life practicing
medicine and pursuing his other great passion: collecting
plants.
As
the years passed, Vaseys medical practice flourished.
The construction of the Fox River Railroad in 1854 allowed
him to extend his medical practice to Elgin. He opened a
dry goods store to support a growing family including four
children, his wife, Martha, and mother, Jane. The breadth
of his botanical correspondence and collecting expanded
as well.
By
1858, his list of correspondents numbered in the dozens
including S. B. Mead of Hancock County, John Kennicott of
Cook County, Michael Bebb of Winnebago County, and Dr. Engelmenn
of St. Louis. Late in that same year, Vasey, Kennicott,
and several other prominent naturalists established the
Illinois Natural History Society. The Society supported
natural history and agricultural innovation, eventually
evolving into the Illinois Natural History Survey. Vasey
served as president and collections curator for several
years.
A
son Frank was born in 1859, and Flora Nancy, a daughter,
in 1861. Vasey became a prolific writer for the Prairie
Farmer and the Natural History Society. His books and articles
included floristic inventories of the entire state, treatises
on buffalo, and even a book on the philosophy of laughing
and smiling.
Aaron
Vasey was born in 1864 and named for Georges brother
killed at the battle Fredericksburg the year before. This
year (1864) is the apex of Dr. Vaseys Illinois botanical
correspondence encompassing nearly fifty other collectors.
It also marks the beginning of a series of events that would
result in the Vasey family abandoning northeastern Illinois
forever. In rapid succession, measles, scarlet fever, and
whooping cough devastated both parents and children. Aaron
Vasey succumbed to whooping cough in June, four months after
his birth.
Martha
Vasey grew progressively weaker. In a desperate attempt
to save her life, George moved the family to Richview, Illinois
in Washington County in 1866. The fervent hope that a milder
climate might improve his wifes condition proved short
lived. She died within a month of the move.
Vaseys
botanical correspondence ceased until 1867, when he began
to write once again to long time friend Michael Bebb, a
botanist from Rockford. Perhaps the fact that Bebb had also
lost his own wife a year before created a special bond between
the two men.
In
1871 after joining John Wesley Powells exploration
of the Colorado River, Vasey accepted a position in Washington,
D.C. as the first botanist for the Department of Agriculture.
Later he would become the first Director of the Smithsonians
National Herbarium, a position Vasey would retain until
his death in 1893.
Specimens
of Wilderness
The
period from 1848 when Vasey arrived in Illinois until his
relocation to Washington in 1866 holds the most relevance
for restoration ecologists working in the Chicago region.
His correspondence is rich in first-hand information relating
to the areas natural history. Shortly after arriving
in Illinois, Vasey renewed his association with Gray. His
earliest letter conveys the excitement for botany felt by
this 28-year-old newly graduated physician:
"I
have for some time had it in contemplation to write to
you, believing that you will be interested in a few remarks
on the botany of this section... I have concluded to give
you a list of the plants with some occasional remarks
which may possibly be serviceable to you in the preparation
of a second edition of your manual which by the way is
an exceedingly valuable book, and has been of great service
to me, and I presume many other learners of botany."
October 9th, 1849, Ringwood, Illinois
Vasey
included in this letter "A List of Some Interesting
Plants of McHenry County Illinois," a handwritten key
placing many plants he observed as occurring in either prairies
or barrens. Some of those observations on now-rare plants
are striking today, 150 years after they were first penned.
Platanthera
leucophaea (prairie white-fringed orchid), Common
in prairies and barrens
Cypripedium
candidum (small white lady slipper orchid), Abundant
in marshes and wet places
Sporobolus
heterolepis (prairie dropseed grass), Perhaps the
most common grass of the prairie.
Castilleja
coccinea var. flava & sessiliflora (Indian paintbrush),
found together and most abundant.
While
Vaseys notes on individual species are insightful,
the tantalizing hints concerning the appearance of the larger
landscape should be even more compelling to todays
land managers.
For
instance, Vasey selected only two natural communities
prairie and barrens in assigning specific habitats
to the plants he had identified. In 1849, much of the rugged,
poorly drained topography of northeastern Illinois still
defied cultivation despite the fact that settlement had
begun more than a decade before. The country was recovering
from a severe economic depression, called the Era of Hard
Times, that had lasted more than 10 years. Agricultural
drainage lay 30 years in the future. Thus in many areas,
the sparsely settled landscape of McHenry County still retained
large blocks of native vegetation.
The
character and richness of the prairie is understood today
as well as it was in Vaseys time. By 1849 the fecundity
of the prairie soils had been well established and the introduction
of the steel moldboard plow earlier in the decade had convinced
most farmers that well-drained prairie soils were superior
for crop production.
The
barrens, however, have been harder to understand. Vasey,
like many of his contemporaries, possessed an intimate familiarity
with the diverse flora of eastern forest. By Vaseys
time the term "barrens" had come to mean a very
specific natural community type, recognized by the predominantly
agrarian society of the time as possessing certain attributes
in terms of structure and composition. Consider the clear
and concise criteria assigned to barrens in Pecks
1836 Illinois Gazetteer:
"In
the western dialect the term barrens has since received
a very extensive application throughout the west...The
timber is general scattering, of a rough and stunted appearance,
interspersed with patches of hazle (sic) and brushwood.These
barrens occur where the contest between fire and timber
is kept up, each striving for the mastery.
"Dwarfish
shrubs and small trees of oak and hickory have contended
for years with the fire for a precarious existence, while
a mass of roots, sufficient for the support of large trees
have accumulated in the earth. As soon as they are protected
from the ravages of the annual fires, the more thrifty
sprouts shoot forth, and in ten years are large enough
for corn cribs and stables.
"The
rapidity with which the young growth pushes itself forward,
without a single effort on the part of man to accelerate
it, and the readiness with which the prairie becomes converted
into thickets, and the barrens into a young forest, shows
that in another generation, timber will not be wanting
in any part of Illinois."
Vasey
clearly distinguished between the barrens and two other
communities he knew well, the treeless prairie and the dense
Eastern forest. He makes it clear that the fire-dependent
oak barrens were a major part of the landscape as he saw
it.
As
interesting and useful as the natural history information
in the Vasey correspondence is, the human drama associated
with the letters is even more evocative. The trials and
triumphs of an individual emerge through flowing cursive
handwriting as one reads the letters.
"I
have the pleasure to announce the recent arrival at my
house of a very interesting young stranger a little daughter
making the third of that kind and including the boys completing
my half dozen. We welcome her to our fireside. Her mother
is doing well thanks to kind providence." February
25th, 1861, Ringwood
"I
know that the attachment between yourself and wife must
have been very strong from the few glimpses I was permitted
to take of your conjugal relations. Alas that our earthly
ties should be so easily sundered. When I lost my little
child last year I thought that this world was a failure
if there was no future for us. But we have the reasonable
and comforting assurance that there is a better and an
eternal world beyond and there we may no doubt be permitted
to continue and perpetuate the friendship and attachments
we form here. So I trust my dear Sir that you have to
sooth your great bereavement the Christian hope of a glorious
reunion above." October 25th, 1865, Ringwood
People
of the Deep Soil
These
poignant vignettes of one mans life have bequeathed
to me one of the most important insights of all into the
management of natural areas. Land is a sentient entity possessed
of a tangible living spirit. Human culture has always been
a personification of the land itself, a mirror through which
nature reflects back her qualities in the character of the
people who become part of that landscape.
Nowhere
does this intrinsic connection to place ring with more resonance
than here in the Heartland. We are people of the deep soil,
rooted in the rich blackness of prairie earth. Equally crucial
to land stewardship is the cultural legacy that is part
of every wild place regardless of its location. We must
understand that as stewards we shepherd not only rare plants
and animals, but also the tears and laughter and dreams
that define each acre as clearly as do its natural communities.
Failing this, we have learned only half of the story that
land yearns to tell us.
The
Midwestern culture we have inherited was intimately connected
to that natural world, directly dependent upon its resources
for survival. Ours is the world the settlers strove to build,
the pinnacle in a long struggle to conquer a wilderness
continent. In an odd way, their greatest and most enduring
legacy may be the doorways they have left us back into that
wild world. In every painting, every journal, every dog-eared
letter lies a secret portal back to the natural world.
One
is tempted to speculate what the good Doctor might have
thought of our rediscovery of the wilderness in our own
backyard were he alive today. I am convinced he would support
it enthusiastically for in one of his final letters from
Ringwood, he wrote these lines to his friend and fellow
botanist Michael Bebb:
"I
believe with you that those who love nature, and researchers
into the field of nature, are generally men and women
of blameless lives. If the poet is correct in saying the
undevout astronomer is mad, would it not be equally proper
to say the undevout naturalist is also mad. For surely
it is our appreciation for things of beauty that we come
closest to ourselves and to the creator of all that is
blessed."
Ed
Collins is a restoration ecologist with the McHenry County
Conservation District and one of the architects of the Nippersink
re-meandering project. His popular course "Landscape
Genealogy" taught at several Chicago Wilderness locations
shows how to research the history of land in the
region.
|