The City Raccoon and
the Country Raccoon By
Jill Riddell

I'm striding down Fifty-seventh Street
in Chicago's Hyde Park when a mammal pops out onto the
sidewalk in front of me. It's dusk, and my vision isn't
perfect, so at first I try to make the mammal familiar
an overweight cocker spaniel, or a rotund cat,
perhaps. But when streetlight illuminates a faintly striped
tail, I realize the animal is a raccoon. As we reach the
front of a yellow house, the raccoon makes a right turn.
The gate is shut, but the raccoon clambers over the fence
and disappears into the shadows of a well-landscaped yard.
Never once does it glance at me, a much larger mammal
only a few feet behind.
| |
 |
|
|
| |
Feasting on fries in a garbage can. City raccoons
wouldn't know what to do in a forest preserve.
Photo by Pam Breitberg.
|
Raccoons are in that small cadre of
mammals that human beings haven't managed to scare off
from living near us. Rabbits, squirrels and a few other
animals have found we're not all bad as neighbors go,
though like the raccoon I saw, they prefer to coexist
rather than interact with us. For these animals, the habitat
we create in urban neighborhoods isn't terrible (as it
would be for a buffalo, for example) and the eating is
pretty good. But city living is not risk-free for raccoons.
Cars are a hazard, the number-one killer of raccoons (disease
is number two). And if a raccoon picks a den site in a
spot humans don't approve of, the coon and its entire
family may be removed and euthanized. (Pest control services
are no longer permitted to relocate city raccoons to forest
preserves.)
And while I have pointed out the hefty
proportions of this raccoon mature males can reach
thirty pounds in the fall I must also understand
that I, too, might choose to put on a few pounds if I
knew that soon I would be starving for several months
straight. Raccoons don't hibernate, but they do spend
many weeks in a dormant state in winter, burning fat reserves
and waiting for the occasional snow-free, mild-temperature
evening when they might be able to come out and forage.
Stan Gehrt, a wildlife biologist at
Max McGraw Wildlife Foundation in Dundee, reminds me of
this fact when we meet to discuss how raccoons are faring
in the Chicago region. For seventeen years, Gehrt has
been studying raccoons in Kansas, Texas, and most recently,
northeastern Illinois.
In 1995, he launched what started
out as a two-to-three-year study on raccoon populations
within the Chicago metropolitan region. He studied three
sites: Busse Woods, which is a Cook County forest preserve
completely surrounded by highways, densely developed residential
neighborhoods and industrial sites; Max McGraw Wildlife
Foundation's property, which is surrounded by suburban
development; and Glacial Park in McHenry County, where
the surrounding land usage is more rural in character.
Seven years later, the study continues to focus on raccoon
population dynamics, accounting for factors such as density,
survival, mortality, age, sex and reproductive success.
To date, Gehrt and his team have marked more than 1,300
raccoons with ear tags and 250 with radio collars. Biologists
have also taken blood and fecal samples from captured
raccoons to monitor the presence and distribution of disease.
 |
|
|
|
|
Rocky and Bambi at home in
the woods. Photo by Eric Fogleman.
|
|
A number of interesting findings have
come from the study. For instance, people previously believed
that as raccoon population density increased inside a
forest preserve like Busse Woods, raccoons would be forced
to leave the woods and establish homes in surrounding
neighborhoods. This turned out not to be the case. Instead,
for the most part radio-collared raccoons didn't even
travel around the entire forest preserve; their territories
are quite small within the preserve, and though they might
venture a few blocks into the subdivisions, none of the
study animals left for good and built dens.
This doesn't mean there are no raccoons
living in those neighborhoods. Rather, it suggests that
raccoons raised in a forest preserve tend to remain in
that preserve, while raccoons born inside the urban matrix
will likely continue to reside in the city or suburban
neighborhood they are familiar with. Rather than leaving
Busse Woods, the raccoons adopt smaller home ranges and
allow other raccoons to occupy the same range.
Another surprise was how seldom raccoons
disturbed the eggs of ground nesting birds. Scientists
had been concerned about the impact of raccoon predation
on other species, so in the third year of the study at
Busse Woods they constructed four hundred nests, each
containing real quail eggs and one plasticene imposter
that, when bitten, retained the teeth imprint of the predator.
Raccoons located about 15 percent of the false nests,
a rate lower than in surveys conducted in more rural areas.
Gehrt says this may be due to urban raccoons' reliance
on human garbage.
Radio telemetry of the collared raccoons
showed that raccoons tend to take a direct path between
their den and picnic areas. "The raccoons in Busse
Woods aren't spending a lot of time foraging on the ground,"
says Gehrt. "While the artificial resources brought
in by people result in an abnormally high raccoon population,
the presence of the garbage may actually reduce the impact
of raccoons on some species."
However, Gehrt adds that there is
anecdotal evidence suggesting that raccoons may affect
frogs and other amphibians and reptiles more than they
affect birds. Eggs don't appear in bird nests until the
weather is quite warm, but frogs show up in early spring
when raccoons are still ravenous from the long winter.
And when frogs begin to sing, mate, and lay eggs, picnickers
bringing food have not yet appeared in the preserves,
so raccoons rely more on natural food sources. Since the
raccoon population is so large (raccoon populations in
urbanized, highly developed areas are roughly four to
twelve times greater than those in rural locations), prey
species may be hit harder than they would be in a more
natural situation. No study on amphibians and reptiles
has yet been conducted to confirm this theory though.
Along
with their more serious findings, researchers also made
some lighter discoveries. They observed that some raccoons,
especially females, become "trap-phobic" and
are extremely difficult to trap a second time, but other
raccoons become "trap-o-philes," going willingly
into the traps over and over again. Sometimes Gehrt would
find a repeatedly-caught male comfortably asleep in a
trap and it wouldn't have even bothered to finish
eating all the bait food.
Gehrt's team also found that French
fries caused the biggest food fights among raccoons. Perhaps
most telling of all, the observers spent the better part
of one evening watching a raccoon walk around with a Dunkin'
Donuts bag on its head.
Yet for all that the study has uncovered
over seven years a long time for wildlife surveys,
which often run out of funding before they can track trends
for anywhere near that length of time Gehrt is
careful to say that there is much he still doesn't know
about raccoons.
He points to the variety of individual
characteristics he has observed among raccoons. While
many raccoons may follow a certain pattern of behavior,
and it is useful to understand such patterns, Gehrt says,
"typically you'll find 10 to 15 percent that will
do the opposite." He also says, "People call
me an expert, but one thing I've learned from working
with raccoons for so long is, I'm not an expert."
For tips on discouraging raccoons
from coming to live with you, check out the Kildeer Countryside
Virtual Wetlands Preserve at www.twingroves.district96.k12.il.us/Wetlands/WatchTower/NWRaccoons.html.