Current Issue
News of the Wild
Calendar
Into the Wild
Back Issues
Subscriptions
Advertising
Messages
Links

 

 

 

We humans are one species with the unparalleled capacity to alter our landscape and, thus, have a solemn responsibility to use our power for good.

 

 

 
Editor's Note

Fall 2000

Debra Shore, Editor

At Home with Wildlife

Some years ago, while researching an article on America’s national parks, I began to collect examples of Funny Questions Visitors Ask. Some examples of this genre include:

 

Jerry Sullivan's stories of people's interactions with local wild animals illustrate our ignorance of wildlife biology. Photo by Gary Davis.


"When do you lock up the wildlife for the night?"

"When do the deer turn into elk?"

"How much of this cave is undiscovered?"

"Why were all the Civil War battles fought in national parks?"

These examples give us a chuckle. But they also reveal our ignorance—and the experience of park rangers suggests that it is widespread—of natural processes, wildlife biology, and our own history.

But ignorance in this arena, as in any other, merely describes a lack of knowledge. It carries (or should carry) no shame attached. I’ve certainly learned as a reporter over the years to swallow my pride and ask questions, the only dumb question being the one I’ve neglected to ask. However, ignorance sidles up to stupidity when we refuse to learn or to change our views in the face of ample facts to the contrary.

Our widespread lack of knowledge about the history of this region is demonstrated by the near-disappearance from our cultural lexicon of Donald Culross Peattie and Louise Redfield Peattie. Once the highly popular and nationally-renowned author of books such as An Almanac for Moderns and A Prairie Grove, Donald Peattie today is nearly forgotten and his works are out of print. Fortunately, in this issue, writer Peter Friederici has performed a fine public service in re-introducing us to this early and spirited celebrant of Chicago’s wilderness.

Our ignorance about wildlife biology is reflected in Jerry Sullivan’s stories of people’s interactions with local wild animals. Are they pets—objects of our affection and devotion, yet completely subject to our mastery and whim? Are they dependent, parasitic pests? Or are they truly wild creatures?

And what happens when the boundaries of dependence and independence blur as they certainly do in our urban/suburban/wild intersections? What happens when we fail to acknowledge the differences between pets and wild animals and seek to domesticate creatures that had formerly been wild (as some would have us do with the white-tailed deer)?

Even wild creatures become subject to our will and the effects of our enterprise when developers fragment habitats. When we eradicate predators or let invasive species destroy ancient ecosystems, we disrupt our wild neighbors in ways large and small. Our relationship with other animals is necessarily driven by complex feelings. But our dominance in the natural world, though unavoidable, need not be absolute and need not be hostile.

In fact, the paradigm exemplified by Chicago Wilderness suggests a new way by returning us to a place in nature not as master or subduer but, rather, in the role of caring stewards. The Chicago Wilderness paradigm recognizes that human intervention is essential if our remaining natural areas are to become healthy habitat for entire suites of birds and bees and butterflies, snakes and salamanders and savanna blazing stars.

But the Chicago Wilderness paradigm also carries with it enormous humility and respect. It acknowledges that we humans are one species with the unparalleled capacity to alter our landscape and, thus, have a solemn responsibility to use our power for good. It also means that we will need to make hard decisions and do hard things, such as cutting some trees to allow whole natural communities to thrive, or reducing the numbers of deer, or setting fires under controlled conditions. We have to do these hard things because that’s part of being responsible stewards, owning up to our actions, and making amends. It’s part of being fully human.

This issue features dispatches from the front—on developers, deer, fire, and bird poop. Living with nature challenges our culture. The mammals and plants and insects and fishes with which we share our metropolitan habitat are, in many respects, our distant kin. If we learn to be wise about it, we can take great joy in having these neighbors. From an affectionate and respectful distance.


Debra Shore may be reached at editor@chicagowildernessmag.org.

 


What is Chicago Wilderness? | Store | Donations | Contact Us | Home

Copyright 2008 Chicago Wilderness Magazine, Inc.
Revised .